That's got to be in the Bible, right? Actually, no, it is nowhere to be found in the Bible. But many people quote it as if it were. And so Representative and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi apparently has helped herself to creating her own personal additions to the Bible. According to this article, for Earth Day she "quoted" (or at least paraphrased) the non-existent Scripture, "To minister to the needs of God's creation is an act of worship. To ignore those needs is to dishonor the God who made us." Funny, I just don't remember that one. And she couldn't be bothered with a pesky thing like a Scripture reference. But apparently it is one of her favorites, as she has quoted it on several occasions.
It's one thing when the Enemy attacks the words of Scripture, but quite another to attempt to discredit the Bible on the basis of things that aren't even in there. By the same token, even when we quote Scripture that is actually in the Bible, we must be careful to not quote it in such a way that we make it say what it truly does not mean in its context. Those of us who hold God's Word in its proper high esteem should guard its meaning as well as its words.
Interestingly, one of the interviewees for this article was Claude Mariottini, who was my Old Testament teacher in college.
Showing posts with label Environment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Environment. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
Thursday, March 13, 2008
What's Wrong with This Picture?
The statement "A Southern Baptist Declaration on the Environment and Climate Change" I discussed in my last post has really stirred things up all over. There is a significant amount of secular media attention to this. And there is a whole lot of internal discussion about it within Southern Baptist ranks.
I see a whole lot about this initiative that is not good.
1. The title was poorly chosen. Despite statements by both the group behind the Declaration (Southern Baptist Environment and Climate Initiative) and the SBC itself, calling this a "Southern Baptist Declaration" gives the false impression that this is an official statement of the Southern Baptist Convention.
2. Frank Page should never have signed this. Again, the President of the Southern Baptist Convention signing a "Southern Baptist Declaration" gives the false impression that this is an official statement of the SBC. Others, like ERLC's Richard Land, showed more wisdom in this regard.
3. Where global warming is concerned, the document presumes the existence, a human cause, and a possible human corrective, all of which are contested. As just one example, earlier this month, a group of scientists met to refute the idea of human-caused global warming. I want to look at all three of these presumptions in more detail later. But there is also the idea that the concept of human-induced global warming is not a theological issue, that the Bible has nothing to say about it. I'll get to that later as well (obviously, that implies I don't agree).
4. The Declaration as a whole does not represent a consensus of Southern Baptists. I have reasonable doubt that it would ever pass from the convention floor as a resolution.
5. Omitting the section on global warming, the Declaration is largely redundant. Southern Baptists have officially expressed ourselves regarding care for God's creation in resolutions like the one in 2007. This new statement was really not needed.
6. The Declaration has stirred up disunity within Southern Baptists. Baptists don't need trouble getting along, we can find that readily enough. We see in much of Paul's writings in the New Testament a strong concern for unity. This statement is a point of disunity, and I would think that alone would make both sides want to distance themselves from it.
Now that this Declaration is out there, I'm not sure what can be done about it. I would encourage others not to embrace it. But I know that many of those who do embrace it do so out of love for the Creator. And we should not hesitate to embrace those brothers and sisters.
I see a whole lot about this initiative that is not good.
1. The title was poorly chosen. Despite statements by both the group behind the Declaration (Southern Baptist Environment and Climate Initiative) and the SBC itself, calling this a "Southern Baptist Declaration" gives the false impression that this is an official statement of the Southern Baptist Convention.
2. Frank Page should never have signed this. Again, the President of the Southern Baptist Convention signing a "Southern Baptist Declaration" gives the false impression that this is an official statement of the SBC. Others, like ERLC's Richard Land, showed more wisdom in this regard.
3. Where global warming is concerned, the document presumes the existence, a human cause, and a possible human corrective, all of which are contested. As just one example, earlier this month, a group of scientists met to refute the idea of human-caused global warming. I want to look at all three of these presumptions in more detail later. But there is also the idea that the concept of human-induced global warming is not a theological issue, that the Bible has nothing to say about it. I'll get to that later as well (obviously, that implies I don't agree).
4. The Declaration as a whole does not represent a consensus of Southern Baptists. I have reasonable doubt that it would ever pass from the convention floor as a resolution.
5. Omitting the section on global warming, the Declaration is largely redundant. Southern Baptists have officially expressed ourselves regarding care for God's creation in resolutions like the one in 2007. This new statement was really not needed.
6. The Declaration has stirred up disunity within Southern Baptists. Baptists don't need trouble getting along, we can find that readily enough. We see in much of Paul's writings in the New Testament a strong concern for unity. This statement is a point of disunity, and I would think that alone would make both sides want to distance themselves from it.
Now that this Declaration is out there, I'm not sure what can be done about it. I would encourage others not to embrace it. But I know that many of those who do embrace it do so out of love for the Creator. And we should not hesitate to embrace those brothers and sisters.
Monday, March 10, 2008
Knock Me Over with a Butterfly Wing
The science of meteorology is far from an exact science. That is something we have all experienced firsthand. For example, a few weeks ago, every meteorologist in town was predicting the biggest snow event of the season for us. And then, it didn't happen. Some places got a few flakes, but it was closer to the smallest snow event of the season than the biggest. It is very hard to get a good idea of what the weather is doing in one location, let alone the whole world. This is at least in part due to what is popularly called "the butterfly effect," which is the idea that a seemingly innocuous and impossible to measure event such as the flutter of a butterfly's wings in Asia might be the initial condition in a set of dependent events that results in a storm system off the west coast of North America. And yet we are being told by some people that they know for certain that there is global warming occurring and that it is a result of mankind's activities.
That's not really news, the global warming thing has been kicking around for a little while now. But what surprised me today every bit as it surprised the Associated Press was this story that says several Southern Baptist leaders, including President Frank Page, signed a document stating that Southern Baptists have a Biblical duty to stop global warming. Although it acknowledges, in slightly dismissive terms, both those scientists and those Southern Baptists who do not accept mankind-caused global warming, signers of this document "resolve to engage this issue without any further lingering over the basic reality of the problem." Setting aside the common sense of "If it ain't broke, don't fix it," this document states in no uncertain terms that we don't care if it is true or not, we need to do something. I guess we can be thankful we didn't issue a similar statement about global cooling during the 1970's - think how foolish we would look now.
I'm sure I will have more to say later about both this document and the global warming issue, but let me say now that I do agree with some of the guiding principles involved. Christians do have a duty to take care of this world, and especially to be responsible for our own activities like littering and recycling. But we also know how it is going to end.
That's not really news, the global warming thing has been kicking around for a little while now. But what surprised me today every bit as it surprised the Associated Press was this story that says several Southern Baptist leaders, including President Frank Page, signed a document stating that Southern Baptists have a Biblical duty to stop global warming. Although it acknowledges, in slightly dismissive terms, both those scientists and those Southern Baptists who do not accept mankind-caused global warming, signers of this document "resolve to engage this issue without any further lingering over the basic reality of the problem." Setting aside the common sense of "If it ain't broke, don't fix it," this document states in no uncertain terms that we don't care if it is true or not, we need to do something. I guess we can be thankful we didn't issue a similar statement about global cooling during the 1970's - think how foolish we would look now.
I'm sure I will have more to say later about both this document and the global warming issue, but let me say now that I do agree with some of the guiding principles involved. Christians do have a duty to take care of this world, and especially to be responsible for our own activities like littering and recycling. But we also know how it is going to end.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)